Ripple’s $125M XRP Fine Stands as Court Rejects SEC Deal Attempt

By: tronweekly|2025/05/16 15:00:13
0
Share
copy
Key Takeaways:Judge Torres rejected Ripple and the SEC’s joint bid to dissolve the XRP sales injunction.The court ruled that their settlement request failed to meet procedural requirements under Rule 60.Ripple and the SEC are still aligned to resolve the case through a revised joint motion.In a dramatic development in the long-running SEC vs. Ripple lawsuit, Judge Analisa Torres denied a joint motion by Ripple Labs and the Securities and Exchange Commission seeking a path to settlement.The motion sought to lift the injunction in place that prohibited institutional XRP sales by Ripple and reduce the civil fine from $125 million to $50 million. The judge, however, did not grant the request, deeming it “procedurally improper.”#XRPCommunity #SECGov v. #Ripple #XRP Judge Torres has denied the parties’ motion for an indicative ruling. “If jurisdiction were restored to this Court, the Court would deny the parties’ motion as procedurally improper.” pic.twitter.com/4s95ILvzsy— James K. Filan (@FilanLaw) May 15, 2025The crux of the matter is that of the procedural mechanism utilized. Parties had invoked the provision of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62.1, by means of which a district court is permitted to make a non-binding indicative ruling in cases in which its jurisdiction is restricted on account of an active appeal.Judge Torres ruled that even assuming jurisdiction was revived, she would have rejected the motion, noting that the parties had not achieved the required legal burden for this relief.Legal Oversight in Motion Draws ScrutinyThe motion, submitted on May 8, 2025, was preceded by a settlement agreement on April 23 being signed by Ripple’s lawyers and subsequently sanctioned by the SEC. Both had sought the approval of their agreement in accordance with the SEC v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc. standard, in which review of consent agreements is permitted.Based on precedent in the law that is quoted by the judge, this kind of relief is awarded only in “exceptional circumstances.” The motion, however, did not cite Rule 60 at all. Instead, Ripple and the SEC presented the proposal in the form of a “settlement,” missing the proper procedural avenue by mistake. That mistake was fatal.Attorney Bill Morgan clarified that the process of settlement was in motion but went off course on the fourth step, when the court dismissed their indicative ruling on account of a procedural flaw. The court specified that should they desire to proceed, the parties need to re-file according to the proper rule.How the settlement process is going1. Settlement agreement signed by Ripple parties on April 23, 2025 and by the SEC on May 8, 2025 . 2. Parties filed a motion to hold the appeal and cross appeal in abeyance 3. Parties file rule 62.1 motion asking for an indicative...— bill morgan (@Belisarius2020) May 16, 2025SEC and Ripple Still on the Same PageIn spite of the procedural hiccup, Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer, Stuart Alderoty, assured that everything remains the same with regard to the parties’ mutual intent for settlement. He stressed that the court’s decision was for how they should be submitting, but not the substance of their submission.Nothing in today’s order changes Ripple’s wins (i.e. XRP is not a security, etc). This is about procedural concerns with the dismissal of Ripple’s cross-appeal. Ripple and the SEC are fully in agreement to resolve this case and will revisit this issue with the Court, together. https://t.co/vBQdBD3FNe— Stuart Alderoty (@s_alderoty) May 15, 2025Ripple and the SEC are in it together in their quest for a resolution of the case. A re-drafted joint motion, properly supported by Rule 60, should be next. Upon being granted, it would enable the parties to go ahead with a lowered penalty and revoke the ban on sales, the last steps toward an end for this high-profile case.Related Reading | Franklin Templeton Opens Blockchain Fund with $20 Minimum Investment

You may also like

Uniswap is trapped in an innovation dilemma

The various iterations of Uniswap are one of the sources of vitality in the DeFi market, but since 2023, Uniswap has not proposed any substantial innovations, instead adhering to traditional business explorations in application chains, Launchpads, etc., leading to a slump in token prices and market ...

What is the key to competition in crypto banking?

Digital banks, crypto cards, wallets, super apps, and DeFi protocols are all converging towards the same goal: to become the primary gateway for your savings, spending, earning, and transferring in the new era.

The flow of stablecoins and the spillover effects in the foreign exchange market

Research has found that an exogenous increase in net inflows of stablecoins significantly widens the price deviation between stablecoins and traditional foreign exchange, leads to depreciation of the local currency, and worsens the financing conditions for synthetic dollars (i.e., increases the doll...

After two years, Hong Kong's first batch of stablecoin licenses finally issued: HSBC, Standard Chartered make the cut

The regulated entity is set to launch a stablecoin in the first half of this year.

The person who helped TAO rise by 90% has now single-handedly crashed the price again today

As long as people are around, the story continues. But once they're gone, you may not even find a worthy opponent to play against.

3-Minute Guide to Participating in the SpaceX IPO on Bitget

Bitget IPO Prime brings a rare opportunity for global users to participate in world-class unicorn IPOs, allowing ordinary users to equally access the potential economic benefits of top-tier IPOs.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more