a16z: The True Opportunity of Stablecoins is in Complementing, Not Disrupting
Original Title: Agentic commerce won't kill cards, but it will open a gap
Original Author: Noah Levine, a16z General Partner
Original Translator: Saoirse, Foresight News
A few weeks ago, an article published by Citrini Research claimed that stablecoins would bypass Visa and Mastercard, leading to a significant drop in the card networks' stock prices. The crypto community cheered.
The logic behind this is straightforward: AI agents will optimize each transaction, with fees being a kind of "tax," and stablecoins can bypass it.
I live and breathe crypto all day, and I wish this were true, but it is mostly wrong.
Not because stablecoins aren't significant, but because the real opportunity lies not in displacing cards but in serving merchants who struggle with traditional card acceptance.
Cards Will Capture the Majority of the Market
Citrini's argument hinges on one assumption: an AI agent free from human habits will actively optimize out card network fees.
But the credit card is more than just a payment tool. It offers unsecured credit, pre-authorizes uncertain transactions, and provides fraud protection through chargeback rights.
Stablecoins can facilitate transfers, but they fall short in these areas.
Imagine your AI agent books a hotel for you, and it looks nothing like the pictures.
With a credit card, you can dispute and get your money back.
With stablecoins, once the money is sent, it's gone.
82% of Americans hold reward credit cards (referring to credit cards with perks like cashback, points, air miles, hotel points, etc.), with a total of 18 billion cards in circulation worldwide.
For the vast majority of transactions, consumers are unlikely to willingly forgo purchase protection and rewards to opt for a payment method that offers no benefits and is irreversible.
Fraud detection is a significant advantage for card networks: these networks can run models in real-time on billions of transactions.
Stablecoins currently lack a network-level anti-fraud layer comparable to them.
Small payments are often cited as a weakness of credit cards, but card networks have long adapted to such mismatched transactions.
Visa has processed over 2 billion transit tickets by batching multiple swipes into daily settlements.
The card industry has never given up on any type of transaction; it will always invent new products to cover them.
There is also a question: "Smart agents can't hold cards."
But smart agents are essentially just new devices.
Your phone, watch, computer all hold independent tokens pointing to the same card, just like Apple Pay.
Phones have never gone through KYC; they just hold your token, and smart agents do the same.
Visa has issued over 16 billion tokens, and smart agents will also use these tokens.
Visa's Smart Business Framework is in a pilot phase, and Mastercard's Agent Pay has already launched for all U.S. cardholders.
The smart agent commerce protocol jointly developed by Stripe and OpenAI has integrated with Etsy, with over a million Shopify merchants set to go live.
The conclusion is clear:
For existing merchants and consumers, credit cards are almost destined to dominate smart agent commerce.
The opportunity for stablecoins lies elsewhere—in those merchants who have not yet appeared.
Those Yet to Appear Merchants
Every platform migration will always give rise to a wave of merchants that existing payment systems cannot serve.
When eBay emerged, individual sellers couldn’t open merchant accounts, so PayPal served them;
From 42,000 merchants in 13 years, Shopify grew to 5.5 million;
When Stripe was founded, many of its customers hadn't even been born.
The pattern remains consistent: winners serve the merchants that existing giants cannot underwrite.
The AI wave will generate these merchants faster than any previous platform migration.
Just last year, 36 million new developers joined GitHub.
In YC's Winter 2025 batch, a quarter of the companies had over 95% of their code written by AI.
On the popular AI coding platform Bolt.new, out of 5 million users, 67% are not developers at all.
People who couldn't write production-level code two years ago are now shipping software.
They are both buyers and sellers in the developer services market.
Imagine this:
A regular developer uses an AI tool to create a public company financial data dashboard in 4 hours. No website, no terms of service, no legal entity.
Another developer's bot hits it 40,000 times a week at $0.001 per call, generating $40 in revenue each week. No human ever sees a checkout page.
I see developers like this every week.
Their first question is always: How do I get paid?
For most, the answer is: You can't right now.
Existing payment infrastructure struggles to onboard these types of merchants.
It's not a technical problem; it's that payment companies have to underwrite the risk of these merchants once they start transacting.
If a merchant commits fraud or sees a high chargeback rate, the payment company is on the hook.
Tools with no website, no entity, no track record are almost impossible to get through risk review.
The system is working as designed; it's just not designed for this.
Payment companies can adapt, and they have in the past.
But it took PayPal 16 years from launch to the industry's first underwriting guidelines for payment service providers.
These new merchants need to get paid now.
For them, accepting stablecoins is like a street vendor taking cash only.
Not because cash is better, but because these merchants have historically struggled to get approved for card acceptance.
In this gap, stablecoins are the only viable option.
Despite rough wallets UX and still-forming compliance frameworks, protocols like x402 can embed stablecoin payments directly in HTTP requests:
No need for a merchant account, no need for a processor, no need for onboarding, no need to take on the risk of chargebacks.
These merchants aren’t choosing between stablecoins and credit cards.
They are choosing between stablecoins and not getting paid.
A New Commerce Is Emerging Here
Each new wave of merchants eventually gets absorbed by the traditional payment system; this time is likely no different.
But it is always: Merchants first, risk management follows.
During this interim period, stablecoins are the infrastructure.
· Card networks serve merchants that all payment acquirers can underwrite;
· Stablecoins serve merchants that no payment acquirer can underwrite.
The next wave of commerce emerges in this gap.
You may also like

Consumer-grade Crypto Global Survey: Users, Revenue, and Track Distribution

Prediction Markets Under Bias

Stolen: $290 million, Three Parties Refusing to Acknowledge, Who Should Foot the Bill for the KelpDAO Incident Resolution?

ASTEROID Pumped 10,000x in Three Days, Is Meme Season Back on Ethereum?

ChainCatcher Hong Kong Themed Forum Highlights: Decoding the Growth Engine Under the Integration of Crypto Assets and Smart Economy

Why can this institution still grow by 150% when the scale of leading crypto VCs has shrunk significantly?

Anthropic's $1 trillion, compared to DeepSeek's $100 billion

Geopolitical Risk Persists, Is Bitcoin Becoming a Key Barometer?

Annualized 11.5%, Wall Street Buzzing: Is MicroStrategy's STRC Bitcoin's Savior or Destroyer?

An Obscure Open Source AI Tool Alerted on Kelp DAO's $292 million Bug 12 Days Ago

Mixin has launched USTD-margined perpetual contracts, bringing derivative trading into the chat scene.
The privacy-focused crypto wallet Mixin announced today the launch of its U-based perpetual contract (a derivative priced in USDT). Unlike traditional exchanges, Mixin has taken a new approach by "liberating" derivative trading from isolated matching engines and embedding it into the instant messaging environment.
Users can directly open positions within the app with leverage of up to 200x, while sharing positions, discussing strategies, and copy trading within private communities. Trading, social interaction, and asset management are integrated into the same interface.
Based on its non-custodial architecture, Mixin has eliminated friction from the traditional onboarding process, allowing users to participate in perpetual contract trading without identity verification.
The trading process has been streamlined into five steps:
· Choose the trading asset
· Select long or short
· Input position size and leverage
· Confirm order details
· Confirm and open the position
The interface provides real-time visualization of price, position, and profit and loss (PnL), allowing users to complete trades without switching between multiple modules.
Mixin has directly integrated social features into the derivative trading environment. Users can create private trading communities and interact around real-time positions:
· End-to-end encrypted private groups supporting up to 1024 members
· End-to-end encrypted voice communication
· One-click position sharing
· One-click trade copying
On the execution side, Mixin aggregates liquidity from multiple sources and accesses decentralized protocol and external market liquidity through a unified trading interface.
By combining social interaction with trade execution, Mixin enables users to collaborate, share, and execute trading strategies instantly within the same environment.
Mixin has also introduced a referral incentive system based on trading behavior:
· Users can join with an invite code
· Up to 60% of trading fees as referral rewards
· Incentive mechanism designed for long-term, sustainable earnings
This model aims to drive user-driven network expansion and organic growth.
Mixin's derivative transactions are built on top of its existing self-custody wallet infrastructure, with core features including:
· Separation of transaction account and asset storage
· User full control over assets
· Platform does not custody user funds
· Built-in privacy mechanisms to reduce data exposure
The system aims to strike a balance between transaction efficiency, asset security, and privacy protection.
Against the background of perpetual contracts becoming a mainstream trading tool, Mixin is exploring a different development direction by lowering barriers, enhancing social and privacy attributes.
The platform does not only view transactions as execution actions but positions them as a networked activity: transactions have social attributes, strategies can be shared, and relationships between individuals also become part of the financial system.
Mixin's design is based on a user-initiated, user-controlled model. The platform neither custodies assets nor executes transactions on behalf of users.
This model aligns with a statement issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on April 13, 2026, titled "Staff Statement on Whether Partial User Interface Used in Preparing Cryptocurrency Securities Transactions May Require Broker-Dealer Registration."
The statement indicates that, under the premise where transactions are entirely initiated and controlled by users, non-custodial service providers that offer neutral interfaces may not need to register as broker-dealers or exchanges.
Mixin is a decentralized, self-custodial privacy wallet designed to provide secure and efficient digital asset management services.
Its core capabilities include:
· Aggregation: integrating multi-chain assets and routing between different transaction paths to simplify user operations
· High liquidity access: connecting to various liquidity sources, including decentralized protocols and external markets
· Decentralization: achieving full user control over assets without relying on custodial intermediaries
· Privacy protection: safeguarding assets and data through MPC, CryptoNote, and end-to-end encrypted communication
Mixin has been in operation for over 8 years, supporting over 40 blockchains and more than 10,000 assets, with a global user base exceeding 10 million and an on-chain self-custodied asset scale of over $1 billion.

$600 million stolen in 20 days, ushering in the era of AI hackers in the crypto world

Vitalik's 2026 Hong Kong Web3 Summit Speech: Ethereum's Ultimate Vision as the "World Computer" and Future Roadmap

On the same day Aave introduced rsETH, why did Spark decide to exit?

Full Post-Mortem of the KelpDAO Incident: Why Did Aave, Which Was Not Compromised, End Up in Crisis Situation?

After a $290 million DeFi liquidation, is the security promise still there?

ZachXBT's post ignites RAVE nearing zero, what is the truth behind the insider control?








